Talk:Savegames: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Savegame keyY CardId: new section |
||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
:Is it more clear with my last edit? The RomFS [https://github.com/3dshax/ctr/blob/master/ctrtool/ivfc.c IVFC] is basically identical to savegames, except savegames have the additional filesystem level.(Didn't realize that when I figured out the savegame hashes though) And it's not actually possible to generate the MAC yet with the AES engine, since the keyY for gamecard savegames is currently unknown. --[[User:Yellows8|Yellows8]] 16:57, 3 September 2012 (CEST) | :Is it more clear with my last edit? The RomFS [https://github.com/3dshax/ctr/blob/master/ctrtool/ivfc.c IVFC] is basically identical to savegames, except savegames have the additional filesystem level.(Didn't realize that when I figured out the savegame hashes though) And it's not actually possible to generate the MAC yet with the AES engine, since the keyY for gamecard savegames is currently unknown. --[[User:Yellows8|Yellows8]] 16:57, 3 September 2012 (CEST) | ||
::That's really interesting. I wonder what is the general idea here...Do savegames use the romFS structure.. --[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] 00:00, 4 September 2012 (CEST) | ::That's really interesting. I wonder what is the general idea here...Do savegames use the romFS structure.. --[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] 00:00, 4 September 2012 (CEST) | ||
== Savegame keyY CardId == | |||
Are those two u32 cardIDs mentiond in keyY generation for the first version of savegamy encryption just ROM chip type ID repeated twice, like 45FA009045FA0090 or ROMID/EEPROMID combination? --[[User:Duke srg|Duke srg]] 10:43, 23 February 2015 (CET) |