Talk:CXI: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Frankly I don't think it was AES. I think it's using RSA for encryption. Besides it already used it once for the 2048-bit signature as you said. Wouldn't it make way more sense to also use it for the encryption scheme. [[User:Jl12|Jl12]] | Frankly I don't think it was AES. I think it's using RSA for encryption. Besides it already used it once for the 2048-bit signature as you said. Wouldn't it make way more sense to also use it for the encryption scheme. [[User:Jl12|Jl12]] | ||
: Lol. --[[User:Neimod|Neimod]] 16:06, 20 June 2011 (CEST) | : Lol. --[[User:Neimod|Neimod]] 16:06, 20 June 2011 (CEST) | ||
What's funny? So I guess it's just based purely on speculation? You should say so. That way nobody believes something that isn't right. [[User:Jl12|Jl12]] 22:28, 20 June 2011 (CEST) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
- | - moved this comment to the filetypes page where it's more appropriate | ||