Difference between revisions of "Talk:Title metadata"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (ECDSA Signature) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Are there any known access rights?--[[User:Lazymarek9614|Lazymarek9614]] 17:42, 15 September 2011 (CEST) | Are there any known access rights?--[[User:Lazymarek9614|Lazymarek9614]] 17:42, 15 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | As said there is 0x00010005 representing the ECDSA. However I haven't even encountered any TMD that using this type of signature. Even I've found two DER format certificates in Process9 NCCH/CXI which is contained in FIRM ARM9 section, and the two certs uses "id-ecPublicKey". May be not important at all, but i wonder if that is really used.--[[User:Syphurith|Syphurith]] ([[User talk:Syphurith|talk]]) 10:15, 10 January 2016 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 10 January 2016
I wondered if it was wrong,too.But TMD size is sometimes diffrent. Matyapiro31
Are there any known access rights?--Lazymarek9614 17:42, 15 September 2011 (CEST)
As said there is 0x00010005 representing the ECDSA. However I haven't even encountered any TMD that using this type of signature. Even I've found two DER format certificates in Process9 NCCH/CXI which is contained in FIRM ARM9 section, and the two certs uses "id-ecPublicKey". May be not important at all, but i wonder if that is really used.--Syphurith (talk) 10:15, 10 January 2016 (CET)