6,263
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 73:
Line 73: +
no edit summary
::::You do not "call" crypto functions here, this is a hardware [[AES]] engine with a hardware key-scrambler. "found something that you can execute to decrypt those CDN data" Not sure what you mean when we had system-version v4.5 total-control code exec haxx since December. --[[User:Yellows8|Yellows8]] 09:52, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
::::You do not "call" crypto functions here, this is a hardware [[AES]] engine with a hardware key-scrambler. "found something that you can execute to decrypt those CDN data" Not sure what you mean when we had system-version v4.5 total-control code exec haxx since December. --[[User:Yellows8|Yellows8]] 09:52, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
:::::I forgot that hours ago. sorry. I thought we would be able to feed those raw data we got from CDN, and let it decrypt and extract for us. then at least we may be able to find those differences in modules implemented between two nearby versions. Some just fix crash - stablility, and some would fix some vulnerables we may use, and some would indicates those internal logical process of the module's implementation. we can not always rely on those ROP or other black-box methods. when we get the opportunity to build a CFW or a special homebrew that would affect the original behaviours of the system, we may need to modify it right? also that should show us some interesting points if we have ones dedicated on analysing those. --[[User:Syphurith|Syphurith]] 14:51, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
:::::I forgot that hours ago. sorry. I thought we would be able to feed those raw data we got from CDN, and let it decrypt and extract for us. then at least we may be able to find those differences in modules implemented between two nearby versions. Some just fix crash - stablility, and some would fix some vulnerables we may use, and some would indicates those internal logical process of the module's implementation. we can not always rely on those ROP or other black-box methods. when we get the opportunity to build a CFW or a special homebrew that would affect the original behaviours of the system, we may need to modify it right? also that should show us some interesting points if we have ones dedicated on analysing those. --[[User:Syphurith|Syphurith]] 14:51, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
::::::Total-control code exec haxx = access to the [[AES]] engine obviously. "build a 'CFW'" That's not possible because of [[NCCH|RSA]], the only way around that would be to exploit software while the system is booting or exploit Home Menu. And patching the NCCH signature checks(from like savegame haxx with a game) is rather pointless, because you would have to re-patch *every* time you boot your 3DS(there's no need to run a regular homebrew application via NCCH this way either tbh). --[[User:Yellows8|Yellows8]] 16:06, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
===Spam attack===
===Spam attack===