CiTRUS: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:03, 24 April 2012 view source Xcution (talk \| contribs) 157 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:05, 24 April 2012 view source Xcution (talk \| contribs) 157 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 72:		Line 72:

	I am still working on encrypting it properly, but now I can show valid coding base progress. I've formatted this CXI to outline the CXI structure while being unencrypted. You may notice I did not include a logo binary in the ExeFS. This is because I'm not 100% sure if it is legal to distribute that (my guess is not, though) so I'd rather not post that here just to be on the safe side.		I am still working on encrypting it properly, but now I can show valid coding base progress. I've formatted this CXI to outline the CXI structure while being unencrypted. You may notice I did not include a logo binary in the ExeFS. This is because I'm not 100% sure if it is legal to distribute that (my guess is not, though) so I'd rather not post that here just to be on the safe side.


			For now, with the plain region, I will use 1_2_0_200 as the version. This CXI isn't made by the official SDK (it's made through CiTRUS) so that's more of a placeholder version to ensure compatibility and match the plain region data format we see with retail CXI.